December 1, 2010
LumoLabs: Pentax K-5 shutter
Total blur widths as a function of shutter speed for a Pentax K-7 camera (red) and a Pentax K-5 camera (green).
Our recent study of shutter-induced blur for the Pentax K-7 SLR camera has created a lot of buzz in the Pentax community. We are now actually watching to see similiar work been done for cameras of other vendors too.
Meanwhile of course I have been more than curious to see how the Pentax K-5 camera performs in this regard. I am glad to say that the lab work is done and a report is published. You may access it here (HTML and PDF):
You may see this from the chart as depicted above as well. On average, the K-5 shutter induces a pixel blur increase by less than a pixel which should not be noticeable in day to day work. Normally, the increase is less due to other sources of softness or by not shooting at the shutter speed where the effect is largest.
Also note that every camera with a focal plane shutter (every SLR) will exhibit a certain amount of shutter blur for physical reasons.
We are not surprised to see the issue of shutter-induced blur for Pentax mitigated in the K-5. After all, the previous study for the K-7 was in reaction to numerous complaints and for the K-5, the first user feedback is very positive, incl. sharpness at the critical shutter speeds.
The conclusion cited from the white paper is this:
The shutter-induced blur in the Pentax K-5 is measurable but it should be small enough to be of no concern in day to day photography. The absolute magnitude of the effect sits halfway in between a K20D which has almost no measurable effect and a K-7 which exhibits an effect large enough to make some people notice in their work.
The matter may now have reached a satisfactory state with the K-5. But there remains work to be done for Pentax to fully understand and eliminate any unnecessary effects which compromise image sharpness.
It would be interesting to test another camera with fast shutter (like a D300s) to compare the absolute magnitude of the shutter blur effect which is never zero. Esp. at ~1/160 s. Ideally, vendors would measure it and make part of their cameras' shutter specification.
Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)
Thanks for the report !ReplyDelete
Well Done and Good Job, Falk. This let Pentaxians know how K-5 would be for one of the major issues of the K-7, finally!ReplyDelete
Thanks for this work, Falk; I'm glad to see the blur is unlikely to be an issue for most photographers. I'll be linking to this article in my ongoing K-5 review.ReplyDelete
BTW have you seen this:
I came across it the other day and wanted to know what you thought. I think you disproved the low-pass filter on SR around 1/80 recently, but I haven't seen any test data at telephoto length to back it up. Do you have any data at say the 200-300mm range? All of tests I've seen have been at the 50mm focal length, which makes it hard to test judge SR effectiveness past 1/100s.
In my blog, there are two 2010 articles (Shake reduction revisited, April; Shutter-induced blur, June). The former is basically made obsolete by the latter and needs an update.
In the June article, you find efficiency data for SR beyond 50mm (in one big chart). E.g., at 300mm, efficiency is pretty good across the range down to 1/500s. I would say 2 stops but better look at the chart yourself.
The full graph (Fig.3) is here:
The sribd article is from Peter Smith and it is cited in the June article. We even use his data in one chart to compare with his work.
Thanks Falk! Great work!ReplyDelete
Scientific and thorough analysis of K-5 shake and niceties on but where is The Review of K-5? Half a world have published it but we would like to hear you opinion! It´s about time! And what`s the native ISO of K-5? Does it have focus confirmation with manual lenses and m-mode? Much obliged to hear the answer. Thanks. StanisReplyDelete